Estate of Walden
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an application, under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to have the succession to the estate of Matilda Walden determined. The court adjudged that Martha Monro was a niece of the decedent and was entitled to one-half of the estate, and that the five children of Jane Ross, deceased, who was also a niece of the decedent, were entitled to the remaining half. William Latimer and five other persons, claiming as descendants of James Latimer, a deceased uncle of the decedent, have appealed from this judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The decedent,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pizzorno v. HerendeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Garaventa v. GardellaNevada Supreme Court · 1946
- Thornton v. PhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- In Re Estate of WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.