Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Peterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1953No. Civ. 15555PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This action was instituted by a child through his mother, Anne Kinney, against defendant to have it determined that defendant is the father of plaintiff, and to secure support, counsel fees and costs. At the trial the only witnesses produced were defendant and plaintiff’s mother. The jury brought in a verdict for defendant. From the judgment entered on that verdict plaintiff appeals.

The child was born July 26, 1948. The complaint was not filed until July 10, 1951; The cause was tried in March, 1952. The evidence was directly conflicting. Anne testified to meeting respondent on an army…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. CrandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. PaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Dastagir v. DastagirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Huntingdon v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Comish v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Fults v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Fults v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Dankert v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API