Legal Opinion

Pizzorno v. Herendeen

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1961No. Civ. 19409PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict awarding the entire estate of Frank Rivolo to the respondent, in a proceeding to determine heirship under section 1080 of the Probate Code. The question on appeal is whether the respondent, Dorothy Rivolo Herendeen, is entitled to the entire estate of Frank Rivolo as his equitably adopted daughter or only one-fifth of the estate as his niece. Appellants, who are the collateral heirs of the decedent and his predeceased spouse, concede that the respondent is entitled to one-fifth of the estate as the niece of Frank Rivolo, but argue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Walker v. CallowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Multhaup v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Steed v. Imperial AirlinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Calista Corp. v. MannAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Estate of WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. In Re Estate of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Estate of ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API