Legal Opinion

State v. Donahue

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Oourt. — HoN. H. M. Remley, Judge. OosrviCTioN on indictment for illegal sale of liquor. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGlaiN, J.

It is not necessary, in an indictment for maintaining a place for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, to negative defendant’s right to sell under the 1. place of meat. mulct law, nor to specify in what respect the mulct law has been violated by defendant in conducting his saloon. Code, section 2424. Ritchie v. Zalesky, 98 Iowa, 589; State v. Van Vliet, 92 Iowa, 476; State v. Pressman, 103 Iowa, 452; Bartel v. Hobson, 107 Iowa, 647. It is for the defendant in the first instance to introduce evidence of compliance with the conditions of the law. It was admitted by the prosecution that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. VanVlietSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Bartel v. HobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. State v. BussamusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Ritchie v. ZaleskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. State v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. League v. EhmkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Bell v. HammSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. State v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Sawyer v. OliverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Reusch v. LoserthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API