Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hamm

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 23, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, Qass District Court.— HoN. O. D. Wheeler, Judge. Action in equity to enjoin an intoxicating liquor nuisance. There was a decree as against defendant W. S. Hamm, and be appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The defendant and appellant, W. S. Hamm, operates a mulct saloon in the city of Atlantic, this State. Save in the respect presently to be taken note of, it is conceded that all the requirements of law relative to the conduct of such places have been complied with. Some time before the commencement of this action the Hamm Brewing Company, of whom appellant purchased all the beer dispensed by him in his saloon, erected near the railway tracks in said city a cold storage warehouse sufficiently large to hold a car load of beer, and gave the use thereof over to appellant for the storage of beer.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bartel v. HobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. State v. ViersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Cameron v. FellowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Carter v. BartelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. State v. BussamusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. ByingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Sawyer v. OliverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. In re the Appeal of the Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Miltenberger v. Roney & FoutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Des Moines Brewing Co. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API