Legal Opinion

State v. Bussamus

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Sioux District Court. — HoN. George W. WaKefield, Judge. The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting bim of maintaining a nuisance.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, J. — I.

1 During tbe trial it was stipulated that all the conditions of section 2448 of the Code had been complied with, except those hereinafter mentioned. The wife and son of one Hastings notified the defendant not to furnish him intoxicating liquors. As the defendant admitted receiving this notice, the point made against oral proof of its contents requires no attention. Thereafter he sold Hastings Pepsin Bitters. As one witness testified this drink was intoxicating, there was a conflict in the evidence as to whether the defendant had violated the *12eleventh, subdivision of the section…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  2. State v. PickettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Achey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Morrison v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  5. Townsend v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. State v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Bell v. HammSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. State v. BufordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Garrett v. BishopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API