Legal Opinion

State v. Shackleford

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

— The indictment does not describe the property or place where it is alleged the nuisance was maintained. It charges but one offense. No abatement was asked. It charges that defendant maintained a place in Clarke County, Iowa. The specific language is that:

“On the 20th day of May, 1923, in the county of Clarke aforesaid, and on divers other days between May 20, 1923, and the finding of this indictment, in the county and state aforesaid', did erect, establish, continue, and use a building, erection, and place, with intent and for the purpose then and there and *753therein to sell intoxicating'…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. State v. ViersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. State v. WaltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ArlunoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. State v. TibbitsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. State v. CahalanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Davidson v. BradfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Locke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API