Legal Opinion

Reusch v. Loserth

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 16, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Coicrt. — Hon. James D. Smyth, Judge. Plaintiff brought this action to enjoin an alleged liquor nuisance. After trial, plaintiff’s petition was dismissed on the merits, and the costs taxed to plaintiff. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged that he was a citizen of Des Moines county, and stated in a general way that defendant was illegally selling and keeping for sale intoxicating liquors in his property in the city of Burlington, which property was described. Defendant’s motion for a *229more specific statement was sustained, and plaintiff was required to state wherein it was claimed defendant was violating the law. Plaintiff amended, and charged, in substance, the making of sales from day to day in the place, and that defendant permitted benches and chairs in front of the bar, and that the business was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BussamusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. State v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. State ex rel. Miltenberger v. Roney & FoutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Tuttle v. CarraherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks, No. 374Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Batten v. Snearly Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API