State v. Gifford
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Court.- — Hon. Obed Cast well, Judge. Action to enjoin a liquor nuisance. Decree was entered as prayed against all Of the defendants except H. E. J. Boardman. As to him the petition was dismissed. E. H. Gifford and the state appeal, that of Gifford being first perfected.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
1 There was no error in entering a decree against Gifford. According to his own testimony, he had violated at least one of the conditions' on which the bar to proceedings under1 the prohibitory law depended. He testified that, after beginning business under the mulct law, he caused a doorway to be opened from the single room in which he conducted his saloon into a back room, in which he used to store liquors and through which he carried beer and ice to the saloon from the alley. In maintaining this doorway from the back of his saloon into a storeroom, he disregarded the plain prohibition *650of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. OttoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- State v. BussamusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Ritchie v. ZaleskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Enslow v. MinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Sawyer v. OliverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Reusch v. LoserthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- State ex rel. Miltenberger v. Roney & FoutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.