Legal Opinion

State v. Hadley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1997No. 92-4029C2; CA A83868PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*168ARMSTRONG, J.

The state appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found in the search of his vehicle. ORS 138.060(3). Defendant consented to the search, but the court held that the officer lacked authority to request that consent. We affirm.

On November 3, 1992, Oregon State Trooper Johnson saw two vehicles being driven on a public highway, one of which was towing the other. Because the tow was being conducted in an illegal manner, Johnson turned on the overhead lights on his patrol car and stopped the drivers of the two cars for the violation. Johnson spoke to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. FarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. Cruz-AguirreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. EdgellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. SalvadorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. BretchesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API