Legal Opinion

State v. Salvador

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 2010No. 07FE1459MA; A138522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this criminal case, defendant was convicted after a conditional guilty plea of four counts of possession of a forged instrument, ORS 165.022, and one count of counterfeiting, ORS 647.145(1)(a)(B). On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress and to its failure to merge three of the forgery convictions into a single conviction. We conclude that the court erred in failing to merge the convictions and otherwise affirm.

We begin with defendant’s motion to suppress. We review the denial of a motion to suppress evidence for legal error, State v. Warner, 136 Or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RadtkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. DierksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API