Legal Opinion

State v. Bretches

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 2009No. 060721FE, A134144PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a precursor substance, ORS 475.967, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. As explained below, we conclude that, under the analysis of State v. Toevs, 327 Or 525, 964 P2d 1007 (1998), the trial court correctly denied suppression. Accordingly, we affirm.

The evidence at the suppression hearing consisted solely of the testimony of Jarred Barney, a patrol officer with the Central Point Police Department. Barney testified that he observed several traffic infractions and then pulled over defendant’s truck.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. ZACCONECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. DeneenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. LESNIEWSKICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API