Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1935No. 25351. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between an automobile driven by him and one driven by James Smith, a boy sixteen years of age, son of defendants; the car driven by the son being the family car of the parents.

The accident occurred about eleven o’clock p. m. November 10, 1933, at the intersection of Water and Sixth streets in the city of Ellensburg. Water street runs north and south, and Sixth east and west. Sixth street is paved from the intersection east, and Water street is paved south from the north line of Sixth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rohrer v. SnyderWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Copeland v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Degginger v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Dillabough v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Osborn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Oyster v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gibson v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Thronton v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Carlin v. HaasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API