Legal Opinion

Osborn v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1927No. 20120. Department OnePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

These three actions arose out of a collision between an automobile and a street car owned and operated by the defendant. They were consoli dated for trial. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved for a directed verdict. This motion was overruled. The defendant declined to offer any evidence and stood upon the record made by the plaintiffs. In each case, the jury returned a verdict against the defendant. In the J. L. Osborn case the verdict was for $1,075. In that of W. A. Osborn and wife $1,590, and in that of J. L. Osborn and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cully v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Strafford v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Belkin v. Skinner & Eddy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Coons v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Plastino v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Knight v. BorganWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Oyster v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Brewer v. BernerWashington Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API