Osborn v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
These three actions arose out of a collision between an automobile and a street car owned and operated by the defendant. They were consoli dated for trial. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved for a directed verdict. This motion was overruled. The defendant declined to offer any evidence and stood upon the record made by the plaintiffs. In each case, the jury returned a verdict against the defendant. In the J. L. Osborn case the verdict was for $1,075. In that of W. A. Osborn and wife $1,590, and in that of J. L. Osborn and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cully v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Strafford v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Belkin v. Skinner & Eddy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Coons v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Plastino v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Knight v. BorganWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Oyster v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Brewer v. BernerWashington Supreme Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.