Legal Opinion

Copeland v. North Coast Transportation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1932No. 23835. Department OnePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of a collision between an automobile in which she was riding as a guest, and a stage, or bus, owned and operated by defendant. The jury awarded plaintiff a verdict, upon which judgment was subsequently entered after denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial. The defendant has appealed.

Two errors are assigned by appellant: first, the court’s refusal to withdraw from the jury the question whether the stage was properly equipped with good and sufficient lights; and second, the court’s refusal to withdraw…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Osborn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Day v. PolleyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Harry v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hunter v. Lincoln Stages, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Grobe v. Valley Garbage Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Robison v. SimardWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Knight v. BorganWashington Supreme Court · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API