Legal Opinion

Oyster v. Dye

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1941No. 28285PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiffs herein, B. M. and Ethyle T. Oyster, sued defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Dye, for damages suffered by plaintiffs as the result of personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision between plaintiff’s car, driven by Mr. Oyster, and a truck owned and operated by defendants, driven by one William Fabey. June 23, 1938, plaintiffs, accompanied by their guests, Mr. and Mrs. Hollis and their infant child, were driving in a Plymouth sedan, the property of Mr. Oyster’s employer, in a northwesterly direction along state highway No. 9, an arterial, a few miles northwest of the town of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Herstein v. KemkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsenWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Woyak v. KonieskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Union Bus Lines v. MoulderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API