Legal Opinion

Teer v. Jordan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1950No. 458PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The court below in ruling in favor of the defendants on the ultimate issue of law raised by the pleadings inferentially disposed of two questions which apparently were not pressed on the hearing in the Superior Court, namely, the capacity of the plaintiff to maintain this suit for the purposes declared, and to maintain it against these defendants who compose an agency of the State constituted for governmental purposes. However, we are not disposed to deny the right of an individual who is one of those for whose benefit the law was enacted to be heard on allegations of an illegal diversion of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Orange County v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Goldston v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API