Legal Opinion

White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. Gunderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. File Nos. 6030, 6042PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Per curiam

These are original actions brought to test the validity and constitutionality of chapter 184, S. L. 1925, relating to the sale of gasoline by the state of South Dakota. They are before us upon demurrer to the complaints. As the same questions are involved in both cases with only slight differences in the facts stated, we consider the cases together. The complaint *612in the case, White Eagle Oil & Refining Company v. Gunderson et al, alleges the corporate capacity of the plaintiff; that it is a nom-resident of the state but a taxpayer within the state paying general taxes, and the tax levied upon…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Laughlin v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  4. Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Coleman v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. SommerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  5. National Bank of South Dakota v. LeirSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API