Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1976No. 70PublishedCited by 281 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

Appellants’ first assignment of error challenges the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss made on the grounds (1) that the State of North Carolina is the real party in interest, and (2) that its sovereign immunity bars plaintiff’s action against both the State and the individual defendants, who were State officials acting within the scope of their official authority and in the exercise of the discretion invested in them by virtue of their respective positions.

In determining whether the motion to dismiss was properly denied we first consider whether the doctrine…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by281 opinions

  1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Huang v. Board Of Governors Of The University Of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  5. Isenhour v. HuttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API