Goldston v. State
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUNDS, Justice.
In this case, we must determine whether individual taxpayers have standing to seek relief when they allege government officials *28violated statutory and constitutional provisions by diverting tax levies appropriated for one purpose but disbursed for another. If so, we next must decide whether a declaratory judgment is a proper remedy for such a claim. We reaffirm our long-standing holdings that taxpayers have standing to challenge unlawful or unconstitutional government expenditures and conclude that taxpayers are entitled to seek equitable relief in the form of a declaratory…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Crampton v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Findley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Munger v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Sanders v. State Personnel CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.