Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Boydston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1939No. 28792PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Frank Boydston sued Harold Roberts and George Roberts, doing business as Oklahoma Tire Associated Store, on a promissory note in. the sum of $600. The defense was failure of consideration. Plaintiff surrendered his note and produced no evidence.

Defendants introduced evidence to show that prior to the execution of the note in question, plaintiff and the two defendants were partners. The partnership was indebted in the sum of about $2,000 to the Richards-Conover Hardware Company on an open account. Plaintiff was also a salesman for that company. On August 17, 1937, defendants gave plaintiff the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oilton State Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. El Dorado National Bank v. EikmeierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Dewey v. BobbittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. McMillan v. GardnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Hagan v. BiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cameron v. SissonArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Hawkins v. McElhanonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Strickland v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API