Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1945No. 33,949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 19 N.W.2d 783. Respondent filed a claim for a promissory note for $5,000 against decedent's estate, which was disallowed by the probate court. On appeal, the district court reversed the probate court and ordered the claim allowed. The appeal is from the judgment.

Appellant challenges the finding of fact, without which the judgment cannot stand, that there was a consideration for the note, and the conclusion of law that the note was a valid claim against decedent's estate, even though it had not been presented for payment to decedent or, prior to the filing thereof, to appellant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Foxworthy v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Worth v. . CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Williams v. ForbesIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Earl v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Sutch's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Hendrickson v. GrengsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Schiro v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Henderson v. Bjork Monument Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API