Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Clarke
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 31, 1944No. 31766PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is a suit by George W. Clarke, as plaintiff, against Fred C. Clarke and Mae Bodine Clarke, husband and wife, to recover on three promissory notes and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given to secure the indebtedness represented by the notes. The plaintiff alleged that the notes sued on constituted the third renewal of the mortgage indebtedness. The defendants were served by publication notice. Fred C. Clarke made default. Mae Bodine Clarke filed an answer denying that she was personally liable on the notes and alleging that the mortgage is barred by the statute of limitations.
The case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Bank of Commerce of Sulphur v. WebsterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- First Nat. Bank of Altus v. HendrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Powell v. Security National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. v. CloughNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Henry v. HopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Arias v. Torres Córdova de LuffSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.