Hagan v. Bigler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County. • Action on promissory note. Judgment in the district court for the plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Tarsney, J.:
This suit was commenced to recover upon a promissory note for $500, dated March 15, 1894, payable on or before one year after date; executed by Joseph Hagan and Martha Hagan, plaintiffs in error, to the order of Ella Bigler, defendant in error. The answer was a failure of consideration and also that the note had never been delivered. On the trial of the cause, the plaintiff offered in evidence the note sued upon, and rested; whereupon the defendant, to show the consideration for the making of said note, introduced in evidence an agreement…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bobier v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Deming Inv. Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Dickson v. JoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Zebold v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.