Hawkins v. McElhanon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This action was commenced by plaintiff-payee to recover from defendant-promissors on a note secured by a mortgage on real estate. The defendants answered and alleged that there was a failure of consideration for the note; that there was fraud and misrepresentation by the plaintiff in securing its execution; and that there was no indebtedness due, but rather that plaintiff had been overpaid in a stated amount. The answer also contained a general denial. The evidence disclosed that defendants purchased the premises described in the mortgage from the plaintiff; that the consideration for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Acacia Oil & Gas Co. v. Tidal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- West v. AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Bird v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Holland v. Dolese Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Stephens v. DraperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.