Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. McElhanon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 9, 1957No. 37611PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by plaintiff-payee to recover from defendant-promissors on a note secured by a mortgage on real estate. The defendants answered and alleged that there was a failure of consideration for the note; that there was fraud and misrepresentation by the plaintiff in securing its execution; and that there was no indebtedness due, but rather that plaintiff had been overpaid in a stated amount. The answer also contained a general denial. The evidence disclosed that defendants purchased the premises described in the mortgage from the plaintiff; that the consideration for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Acacia Oil & Gas Co. v. Tidal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. West v. AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Bird v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Holland v. Dolese Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Stephens v. DraperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API