Legal Opinion

Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 31, 2000No. 99-5030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

This is an inverse condemnation — regulatory taking — case, on appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims. Palm Beach Isles Associates, Martin Slifka, Marjorie Margolis and Roberta Franklin, and the Estate of Joseph Slifka (collectively “PBIA”) claim that the United States (the “Government”) effected a regulatory taking of their property in Florida when the Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) refused to grant a permit to dredge and fill the property. The Court of Federal Claims granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment of no liability. See Palm…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API