Legal Opinion
Norman v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 10, 2004No. 95-667 LPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This takings case is before the court following a trial held December 1st through 9th, 2003 in Washington, D.C. Plaintiffs seek just compensation under the Fifth Amendment, alleging that the government took without compensation 220.85 acres of plaintiffs’ property by requiring plaintiffs to set aside this acreage as mitigation wetlands in consideration of obtaining a Section 404 permit to fill and impact other wetlands under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) Amendments of 1972, Pub.L. No. 92-500, § 404, 86 Stat. 816 (1972) (codified at 33 U.S.C. § 1344…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.