Legal Opinion
Walcek v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 5, 2001No. 94-315LPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This regulatory taking case is before the court following a tidal held in Wilmington, Delaware and Bethany Beach, Delaware. Plaintiffs seek just compensation under the Fifth Amendment because the Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) failed to grant a requested permit to allow for the full development of Federal wetlands on plaintiffs’ property. Instead, the Corps issued a limited permit allowing only for a scaled down development, one which plaintiffs claim is not economically viable. Based on the evidence presented, and for the reasons set forth below, the court…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- K & K Const. Inc. v. DeqMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Delores Walcek, Stanley Walcek, Albert Walcek, and Regina Ammons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.