Specht v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Pursuant to section 583 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a judgment of dismissal of this action was rendered on the ground that it was not brought to trial within five years from the filing of the action. Plaintiff has appealed, contending that under the circumstances the dismissal was not mandatory in that the case comes within an implied exception to the statute. There was no written stipulation extending time, and no claim is made that an express exception of section 583 is applicable.
Chronology of events: Plaintiff filed the action on July 26, 1955. Defendant filed its answer on August…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Raggio v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Continental Pacific Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Samuels v. SabihCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Chapin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972