Legal Opinion

Samuels v. Sabih

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1976No. Civ. 48704PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

The issue raised by this appeal is whether a defendant, who has been successful in having the plaintiff’s cause of action dismissed because it was not brought to trial within five years, is entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 1717 of the Civil Code.

The five-year history of the litigation is as follows:

Plaintiffs filed their complaint on April 6, 1967, for specific performance and appointment of a receiver under and by virtue of a note secured by a deed of trust in the amount of $75,000. Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction, an appointment of a receiver,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Associated Convalescent Enterprises v. Carl Marks & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Gray v. KayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Nasser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API