Legal Opinion

State of Utah by Wilkinson v. B & H Auto

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 12, 1988No. Civ. C-87-804WPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

WINDER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss and for more definite statement. A hearing was held on this motion on October 17, 1988. Defendants B & H Auto, Billie Smith, and Hiram Smith were represented by Samuel Alba. Plaintiff, State of Utah, was represented by Ruth Lybbert Renlund. Prior to the hearing, the court had reviewed carefully the memoranda submitted by the parties. After taking the matter under advisement, the court has further considered the law and the facts and now renders the following memorandum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  2. Delay v. Hearn FordDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  3. Tusa v. Omaha Auto Auction Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Stier v. Park Pontiac, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. GAF Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Carrasco v. Fiore EnterprisesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997
  4. Fields v. Mitch Crawford's Holiday Motors Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. WaldropDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API