Legal Opinion

Delay v. Hearn Ford

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 19, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-312PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks relief in this forum under the provisions of Subchapter IV, of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1991, Public Law 92-513, 86 Stat. 947 (1972). This court’s jurisdiction over this action is found in 15 U.S.C.A. § 1989(b). 1 This case appears to be among the first to be brought under this statute, the cause of action allegedly arising the first day-after the effective date of the statute.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On December 23, 1972, plaintiff purchased a 1973 Ford automobile from the…

2Cited by45 opinions

  1. Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1977
  2. Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  3. Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Jones v. Fenton Ford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API