Legal Opinion

Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, Individually

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1979No. 77-2211PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K. K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

In this action we are called upon to construe the mileage disclosure requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 1988 as they apply to an odometer which has “turned over” after registering 100,000 miles.

Plaintiff/appellant Ryan, purchaser of a used automobile, brought the action against defendant Edwards, a used car dealer, defendant Tappahannock Ford, Inc., an automobile dealership, and defendant DuVal, the president and salesman of Tappahannock. 1 The district court directed a verdict for Tappahannock and DuVal, and entered judgment n. o. v. for Edwards, reversing a jury verdict. 2

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. Delay v. Hearn FordDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Kathleen McGinty v. Beranger Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. Molo Oil Co. v. River City Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Metro Auto Auction v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API