Legal Opinion
United States v. Waldrop
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 12, 1991No. CR 91-083-01 to CR 91-083-04PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEALON, District Judge.
In this criminal case, predicated upon an alleged odometer fraud, 1 there are several motions by the defendants to dismiss the indictments the United States (government) has brought against them. 2 Their defenses, inter alia, center on the application of the statute of limitations and the defendants’ withdrawal from the conspiracy and substantive offenses. 3 For reasons which follow, the court will deny the defendants’ motions.
I
The factual background of this case begins in South Carolina, where defendant Waldrop allegedly originated the odometer tampering…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jannotti, Harry P. Schwartz, George X. Appeal of Harry P. Jannotti, in No. 83-1093. Appeal of George X. Schwartz, in No. 83-1094Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States v. BissellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- United States v. FauverDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- United States v. Waldrop (N. A.) A/K/A Waldrop (Fat)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992