Legal Opinion

Stier v. Park Pontiac, Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided March 24, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-129-CHPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

KENNETH K. HALL, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s complaint in this action is based on provisions of the law relating to motor vehicle odometer tampering, enacted by the Congress of the United States in 1972 as a part of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1991. The Court’s jurisdiction is based on 15 U.S. C. § 1989, providing as follows:

§ 1989. Civil actions to enforce libility for violations of odometer requirements ; amount of damages; jurisdiction; period of limitation.(a) Any person who, with intent to to defraud, violates any requirement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Delay v. Hearn FordDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Kathleen McGinty v. Beranger Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  3. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Irvin B. Alley v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API