Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. GAF Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1988No. 19836PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

The State Division of Consumer Protection (the “Division”) appeals from a summary judgment against it in a civil action brought by the Division against GAF Corporation (“GAF”). The Division’s complaint alleges that GAF committed a deceptive act or practice against a Utah consumer in violation of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23 (Supp.1983). The trial court ruled that (1) the Division could not sue for damages to a consumer based on a complaint filed by the consumer with the Division, (2) a builder who sold the GAF product to the consumer…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Millett v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Salvatore J. Sylvestri v. The Warner & Swasey Co., Inc., Salvatore J. Sylvestri v. Comad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Jensen v. Seigel Mobile Homes GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mennonite Deaconess Home & Hospital, Inc. v. Gates Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. RighterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rawson v. ConoverUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Board of Education of Jordan Sch. District v. Sandy City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Workman v. Nagle Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Martinez v. Best Buy Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API