Ex parte Goldman
California Supreme Court
Application of Edward Goldman for a writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
The petitioner was indicted by the grand jury of the county of Merced for the crime of “being an accessory to the commission of a felony.” The particular circumstances of the offense charged are set forth in the indictment as follows: “That said Edward Goldman on or about the 20th day of January, A. D. nineteen hundred and six, .... (after and with full knowledge that one Ross Dunn theretofore at, and in said county of Merced, and on or about the 18th day of January, A. D. 1906, had willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously taken, stolen, and carried away from the freight depot of the Southern…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Britton v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. GarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. PeralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Ex parte RickeyNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Ex Parte ShowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- People v. VathAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.