Legal Opinion
Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2007No. 04-70345PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by PREGERSON;1 Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN; Dissent by Judge BEA.
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Armando Navarro-Lopez petitions for review of a final order of removal, arguing that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) erred in summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination that Navarro-Lopez’s conviction under California Penal Code section 32 for accessory after the fact was a conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude. Based on Navarro-Lopez’s conviction, the IJ concluded he was inadmissible and ineligible for cancellation of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Tijani v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.