Legal Opinion

Britton v. Board of Election Commissioners

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1900No. S.F. No. 1999PublishedCited by 50 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

By an act approved March 3, 1899 (Stats. 1899, p. 47), the legislature added certain sections to the Politi cal Code, providing thereby an exclusive scheme controlling political parties in holding their conventions for the nomination of candidates to public office. The act is known as the primary election law, and for convenience may be so designated. Plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of the city and county of San Francisco, by his complaint sought an injunction against the defendants, constituting the board of election commissioners of San Francisco, to restrain them from expending the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Spier v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Eaton v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Whipple v. BroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API