Legal Opinion

People v. McKenna

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1889No. 20537PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted on an information which charged that, “on or about the fifteenth day of July, 1888, at the county of San Luis Obispo, state of California, [the defendant] did' unlawfully, knowingly, and designedly, by false and fraudulent representations and pretenses, defraud one David Taylor of personal property, to wit, twenty hogs, of the value of $203.40, in lawful money of the United States, *159the personal property of the said David Taylor, coiltrary to the form, force,” etc.

The most important question in the case is whether the facts stated are sufficient to support…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Payne v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Mandeville v. SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Triscony v. BeasleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. People v. DonaldsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API