Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Show
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 3, 1910No. A-943PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Original Proceeding by Writ of Habeas Corpus. Application of A. J. Show for writ of habeas corpus. No briefs reached the reporter.'
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Judge.
The petition herein and the return to the writ issued thereon show that on November 10, 1910, M. A. Breclcenridge, county attorney of Tulsa county, filed in the county court of said county an information against the petitioner, A. J. Show, purporting to charge him with violating section 2083 of Snyder’s Comp. L. Olda., by defrauding an elector of -his vote; which information,, omitting the caption, is in words and figures as follows, to wit:
“Be it remembered, that M. A. Breckenridge, County Attorney in and for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, who prosecutes in the name and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Law v. People ex rel. HuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re GreeneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1892
- Hickman v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. KuselWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Corley v. Adair County CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Dorris v. McKamyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.