Long v. Harrison
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
Upon further consideration of this cause we are led to the conclusion that there is sufficient evidence set forth in the transcript to sustain the judgment, save and except as to the modifications hereinafter set forth. Portions of the opinion filed herein upon first hearing may properly be adopted as expressing our views.
The complaint in this action consisted of two counts, the first of which was for money had and received, the second being for work, labor and service done, and material furnished. During the trial the case was dismissed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Winkler v. JerrueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Firpo v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- McElhaney v. W. E. Moyer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wagner v. WedellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Calhoun v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- California Western States Life Insurance v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Ross v. Prudential Guarantee Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Lloyd v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964