Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1953No. Civ. 19520PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover money which defendant Gary Davis, hereinafter referred to as defendant, obtained by fraud from plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Facts: In October and November, 1948, defendant and his agent, Leonard B. Kinister, made false representations to plaintiff by reason of which plaintiff was induced to enter into a contract with defendant, dated November 23, 1948, whereby in consideration of plaintiff’s agreement to pay defendant $55,000, $10,000 of which was paid forthwith, plaintiff was assigned a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Hennefer v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. McDaniel v. DowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Calabrese v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Lloyd v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API