Wagner v. Wedell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the -City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
Upon the close of plaintiff’s testimony the •court granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit, and judgment was accordingly entered. Plaintiff' appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
The evidence shows substantially the following facts: On July 22, 1903, Lucien Blum and Peter Yerdon executed to de fendant a chattel mortgage on the furniture, household goods and kitchen and dining-room wares, contained in a building known as 41 and 45 Stockton street, to secure the payment of a promissory note for $1,500 and interest to accrue thereon. On the same day the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Floyd v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Bullard v. HascallMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cermetek, Inc., a Corporation v. Butler Avpak, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Truro v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Dodge v. Harbor Boat Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Long v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hansen v. Hansen & Johnson, Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928