Legal Opinion
Nuskey v. Hochberg
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2009No. Civil Action 06-1573 (PLF)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This employment discrimination case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs motion to strike. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers, the attached exhibits, the relevant statutes and the case law, the Court will grant defendant’s motion in part and deny it in part, and the Court will deny plaintiff’s motion as moot. 2
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Sharon L. Nuskey brought this action against her former employer, the Export-Import Bank of the United States, for age and sex discrimination and reprisal for engaging…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nurriddin v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Faison v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Robertson v. DODARODistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Benjamin v. DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Holmes v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.