Legal Opinion
Robertson v. DODARO
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 7, 2011No. Civil Action No.: 08-1944 (RMU)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The pro se plaintiff, an African-American woman, brings this action against her employer, the United States Government Accountability Office (“the defendant” or “the GAO”), asserting claims of disparate treatment based on race and gender and a hostile work environment, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. Because the plaintiff has…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Gonda v. DonahoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Robinson v. Red Coats, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ey v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.