Legal Opinion
Holmes v. University of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 23, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-2169PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Kashawna Holmes worked for the University of the District of Columbia in what municipal regulations call a “sponsored program appointment.” See D.C, Mun. Regs. tit. 8-B, § 1700.1. The University declined to renew her appointment while she was on job-protected medical leave for complications arising from her high-risk pregnancy. In response, Holmes brought this suit against the University for violations of the D.C. Family Medical Leave Act (“DCFMLA”), the D;C. Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), Title VII of the Civil…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baskerville v. CBS News Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Littlejohn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Thomas v. Securiguard IncorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019