Legal Opinion
Moklofsky v. Moklofsky
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1947No. Civ. 13285PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
This suit was brought by the respondents to compel the specific performance of a contract of sale of real property and for a declaratory judgment.
Two sets of findings and two judgments were filed in this case. The first decision was in favor of appellant. Respondents thereupon moved for a new trial. At the same time they made a separate motion to vacate and set aside the findings and judgment. The court vacated the first decision and then made new finding:, and entered a new judgment in favor of respondents. This appeal was taken from that judgment and from the order vacating the first…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Knapp v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Stevenot v. NorbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.