Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1937No. Civ. 11054PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

Relying upon a ninety-nine year lease, to which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest and one of defendant’s predecessors in obligation were the original parties, plaintiff sought recovery under five causes of action. The trial court denied plaintiff any recovery on the first three causes which were, respectively, for six months rent, for taxes which had been allowed to go delinquent, and for a fire insurance premium expended by plaintiff when defendant refused to renew a policy. From this part of the judgment, plaintiff appeals. Both plaintiff and defendant appeal from that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Westmoreland N. Gas Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Wills v. Manufacturers N. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Horton v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. 68 Beacon Street, Inc. v. SohierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Estate of FiltzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. MacCo Construction Co. v. FickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Estate of BevelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Ghirardelli v. Peninsula Properties Co.California Supreme Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API