Legal Opinion

Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1967No. 40671PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeown, J.

The question presented is whether defendants owed a duty to plaintiff wife, a business invitee, to remove natural accumulations of snow and ice from the sidewalk.

An examination of cases involving falls on natural accumulations of snow and ice on public sidewalks is helpful but not dispositive of the case before us. The general rule governing those cases is that the owner or occupier owes no duty to keep the public sidewalk free from natural accumulations of snow and ice. Annotation, 82 A. L. R. 2d 998; 27 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 401, Highways and Streets, Section 297.

Here, the defendants are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Thompson v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Watts v. HolmesWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Wallace H. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brinkman v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jeswald v. HuttOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. McGuire v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. LaCourse v. FleitzOhio Supreme Court · 1986

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API